✓ Teams starting with approved written explanations
✓ Readers comparing script, recording and presenter workflows
✓ Editors budgeting review and revisions
— Fake endorsements or fabricated demonstrations
— Guaranteed income, viral reach or automatic courses
— High-stakes training without qualified review
Name the job of the picture
A visual may demonstrate an action, identify an object, illustrate a concept or simply provide atmosphere. The first two jobs need greater fidelity than the last. If viewers must recognize a real dashboard control, use an approved capture of that control. A generated image of a plausible dashboard can be actively unhelpful, even when it looks professional. Make the visual’s job explicit in the scene map before choosing its source.
Stock is not automatically relevant
A stock clip can be well produced and still add no useful information. Watch for scenes that suggest a different industry, product or outcome than the narration describes. Check whether the same decorative material repeats across several points and makes them harder to distinguish. Use a simple diagram or text-led frame when that communicates the idea more directly. Motion is not a requirement for every useful second of a video.
Generated media needs a rejection test
Before generation, state which defects would make the asset unusable: unreadable labels, incorrect geometry, inconsistent objects or implied evidence of an event that never occurred. Inspect the result at the size it will actually appear. Additional attempts consume time and may consume credits without guaranteeing correction. Keep a practical fallback such as a real photograph, an original diagram or no visual at all rather than endlessly regenerating a decorative scene.
A fictional inventory explanation
A small shop wants to explain the difference between stock on hand and stock reserved for orders. Two original labeled boxes may communicate the concept more accurately than a cinematic warehouse clip. Actual inventory screens should use synthetic sample data or appropriately cleared records. Obtain the necessary rights for every asset; a paid software subscription is not proof that a person’s likeness, a third-party trademark or a customer record may be used. The tool choice follows the evidence requirement, not the other way around.
Where the safety evidence stops
This guide draws on Fliki text-to-video workflow, Fliki credit-operation guide, updated 17 September 2026, Fliki content and service terms. Merchant-controlled records describe the provider’s own capabilities, terms or standards; they do not independently validate those claims. These records do not establish independent confirmation of the product claims.
Verify any current price, plan limit, label direction, compatibility rule, or commercial term that would materially change the decision. The dated source ledger shows the underlying records so this conclusion can be checked and updated.
Sources used for this page
These records support the facts and comparisons above. Merchant-controlled records are labelled so you can separate product claims from independent evidence.
- Fliki text-to-video workflow — Merchant documentation · fliki.ai · Merchant-controlled · checked 2026-09-24
- Fliki credit-operation guide, updated 17 September 2026 — Merchant documentation · fliki.ai · Merchant-controlled · checked 2026-09-24
- Fliki content and service terms — Merchant documentation · fliki.ai · Merchant-controlled · checked 2026-09-24